"It's a damned lie that crime is down"

 By Licia Corbella, The Calgary Herald - July 24, 2010

Good Morning Parents!   As most of you are aware, Statistics Canada has just released it's  crime report for 2009, which it does every summer. Street Smart Kidz  has anticipated the release of this report every summer for the last 5  years, hoping it will tell us something different than what we see on  the streets every day. Hoping it will not reflect what our National,  Provincial and City Police Departments deal with on a daily basis.  Hoping for the best, knowing otherwise.

After going through the report three times, once again frustration  set in. It's amazing how you can manipulate numbers, massage them and  bend them until you see what you want to see, then declare to the  public "we are just fine", "crime is trending lower" and my favourite,  "as the population age's, crime will continue to decrease because 62%  of violent crime is committed by the 18 to 25 demographic". I'm curious  as to why they fail to mention 71.4% of child molesters in Canada in  2008 were 46 years of age or older

So in my frustration of the report and it's conclusions, I spent the  weekend talking to old and new friends in our countries law  enforcement agencies, from Victoria to St. John's, and their over  whelming conclusion was Stats Can needs to include interviews with our  Police Departments before publishing or at the very least, go for a  Ride-A-Long before trying to tell us crime is down.   I then researched the Press for article's on this report and there  were many. I read 17 editorials from coast to coast and all were great  in there own way and staying with the facts.

One article, in my  opinion stood out. It captured the feelings of disbelief and  frustration shared with me by Police Departments and parents.   I'm proud to present the article by Licia Corbella,  lcorbella@theherald.canwest.com, from The Calgary Herald,  www.calgaryherald.com. , as it appeared July 24, 2010.

"It's a damned lie that crime is down"

Big, bold headlines screamed things like:"Crime rate falls 17% in past  decade: report" and " Good News Report' More than 45% of offences minor  thefts". Ahhh. The annual rite of summer, Statistics Canada's crime report is  out - and the living is easy. Or is it?

After "Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2009" was released  on Tuesday, experts were trotted out and talk radio callers and online  commentators said things like: the mainstream media and the 24 hour  news cycle have given Canadians the false impression that crime is  really bad in Canada. "Nothing but fiction", said one. Well, I'll tell you what's akin to a Danielle Steele novel - the idea  that when it comes to crime, it's all picnics and ice cream in Canada.

Sure, crime has started to fall in the past decade - this is a trend  that demographers have predicted for a long time. We have an aging  population and when it comes to crime, the vast majority of it is  committed by males under the age of 30. As the recent report states:  "Youth and young adults commit a disproportionate amount of crime. In  2009, age-specific rates for those accused of crime were highest among  15-to-22-year-olds, with the peak age at 17 years."

The high-water mark for crime was in 1991 and since then there has  been somewhat of a steady, though gradual, decline. But go back to  Statistics Canada's report: Canadian Crime Statistics, 2007 (  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2008007/article/10658-eng.htm)  and take a look at the graphs that chart Canada's crime rate to 2007  from 1962 - you know that pre-Trudeaupian, unenlightened time when we  actually locked up pedophiles and rapists and let our kids run free  instead of the other way around?

The 2008 report starts off with this sunny statement: "Canada's  national crime rate, based on data reported by police, declined for  the third consecutive year in 2007, continuing the downward trend in   crime since the rate peaked in 1991." But right on the same page as that quote is a graph of the crime rate  per 100,000 population in Canada from 1962 to 2007. The crime rate  increase is so steep the graph looks like a drawing of Mount Everest.

In 1962 - when police reported crime started to be mapped - there were  slightly more than 2,000 crimes per 100,000 population; in 2007, it  was a whopping 6,984. But this is mild stuff. For an even steeper,  more precipitous climb, look at the graph that illustrates the  exponential rise in violent crime.

In 1962, there were just slightly more than 200 violent crimes  committed per 100,000 population. In 2007, that number spiked almost  five times to 930 violent crimes per 100,000 population. In other  words, we are a much more violent society today than we once were in  recent history. What is even more alarming about these figures is it  doesn't take into account the aging of Canada's population. Aging  populations should show a decline in violent crime, not an increase. In the report released Tuesday, there is a subheading called: "Youth  violent crime declining, but still higher than a decade ago."

So, the  trend is down, but it's also up, and if you take a longer-term view of  things, it's way, way up. Last year, in a column in the Toronto Sun ( torontosun.com), famed  Canadian defense lawyer Edward Greenspan, who was Conrad Black's lead  trial lawyer two years ago, wrote: "I am frequently told Canada is  soft on crime. I think that is a myth. Canada is tougher on crime than  most people believe, and getting tougher by the day." Nice try Edward.

Yet another example of Greenspan not doing his homework. There's a reason why parents don't let their kids out of their sight  anymore, compared to those of us who grew up in the 60's and 70's, and  it's not because of media hysteria. It's because the amount of really  perverted, depraved crimes have increased exponentially owing to our  revolving-door justice system.

The real myth is the belief parroted by  the hug-a-thug crowd that things have never been better. Forget myth.  That's a big, fat lie. In Thursday's National Post (nationalpost.com), Bob Tarantino points  out that P.E.I. Justice Gordon Campbell looked into the average  sentence meted out for MAJOR SEXUAL ASSAULTS against a child and  learned it was just four years. We're talking rape.

Since most  criminals in Canada serve just two-thirds of their sentence behind  bars, those people who used to be locked up for decades back in the  1960's are usually out in a couple of years to victimize some other  child or children over and over.

So next summer when 2010's crime rate numbers are dished out like a  frosty treat that leaves everyone feeling rather refreshed about  things, remember Mark Twain was fond of repeating: "There are lies,  damned lies and statistics."

lcorbella@theherald.canwest.com